[c.February – March 1779]
1
Mr. Deane in various parts of his Narrative assumes the whole transaction
with Baumarchais – Consider his duplicity by comparing his own letter on
this business by Mr. Francois with his letters in conjunction with his
Colleagues both before and after his letter by Mr. Francois.
In the 42d page of the Narrative it is said “In Mr. Lees absence in Spain a
contract was made with the Farmers General for 5000 hhds Tobo. &c.”
Observe the nature of this Contract and see how injurious it will be
after the price in America, the freight, insurance, and Commissions are
paid.
In Page 44 ’tis said “Mr. Hodge & soon after him Capt. Bell arrived
with dispatches from Congress, in which the Comissioners were directed
to fit out, if in their power to do it armed Cruisers from France to
annoy the British Trade in Europe, and blank Commissions were sent for
this purpose.” See the Secret Committee’s letter to Mr.
Hodge2and observe how totally and expressly
different it is from the State here given by Mr. Deane. See also the
express condition on which alone Congress agree that armed Vessels
shall be fitted out in France, by their resolve on this subject at
Baltimore first of 1777,3immediately
transmitted to the Commissioners. The business of Cuninghames is
expressly opposed to the directions of the Committee, to the resolve of
Congress and to the repeated injunctions of the Court of France. But
Cuninghames affair was a Job of mixed public & private concern for
the benefit chiefly of the latter. See Mr. Hodges letter where he says
Mr. Deane was a third part concerned in this Cutter of
Cunninghames – Thus sacrificing public good & public trust to private
views.
Observe his praises of Williams and compare it with Rob. Morris’s letter
saying Mr. Deane was in partnership with Williams. Also the inclosed
letter from Williams to Deane proposing leave to draw at pleasure on
the Banker at Paris with whom was lodged all the money of the United
States in France, and his particular expression “My connections with
you being known.” See also in the Commercial Committee, the Vessels as
sent by Mr. Williams here with Stores bringing no Charter party, or
information by which it might be known what was to be done with the
Vessels after they had discharged their Cargoes, and the consequent
inconveniences.
This does not imply such great ability as Mr. Deane describes – But it seems
Mr. Williams was Mr. Deanes partner.
Notes:
Lee PapersUniversity of Virginia Archives
1 As Silas Deane’s “narrative” had been read in Congress and submitted to the
Foreign Affairs Inquiry Committee for examination before Lee returned
to Congress on 20 February, it seems likely that Lee obtained access
to the document from and prepared these notes for one of his allies
on the committee, such as Henry Laurens or William Whipple. For
speculation on Lee’s relationship with members of that committee and
the context in which he probably prepared these notes, see the
preceding entry, note 1.
2 See these Letters, 4: 103 – 5
3 Lee is apparently referring to the resolution adopted on 23 December 1776,
shortly after Congress assembled in Baltimore, authorizing the
commissioners “to arm and fit for war any number of vessels not
exceeding six, at the expence of the United States, to war upon
British property, and that commissions and warrants be for this
purpose sent to the Commissioners, provided the Commissioners be well
satisfied this measure will not be disagreeable to the court of
France.” JCC, 6: 1036.
